# Codellama 70b Instruct vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

> MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.7 to 33.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/codellama-70b-instruct-vs-mimo-v2-6-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 4

## Summary

- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Pro in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 66.9 to 33.6.

## Snapshot

| | Codellama 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 33.3 | 46.7 |
| Rank | 236 | 55 |
| Context | — | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.43 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.87 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.0 (#189)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 53.2 (#27)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1618 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 40.7% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1538 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 49.6% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 65.9% | — |

## Reasoning

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 19.2 (#241)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 30.4 (#76)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1052 | 1511 |

## Math

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.9 (#91)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1497 |

## Knowledge

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.0 (#85)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1548 |

## Multimodal

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.2 (#40)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1265 |

## Multilingual

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.9 (#283)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 57.0 (#15)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 992 | 1474 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1532 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1481 |

## Instruction Following

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 52.1 (#288)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#10)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1024 | 1490 |

## Long Context

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#26)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1500 |

## Writing & Preference

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.6 (#272)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.9 (#32)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1057 | 1491 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1465 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1463 |

## FAQ

### Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.7 to 33.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Codellama 70b Instruct or MiMo-V2.6-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.2 versus 37.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and MiMo-V2.6-Pro share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 14.