# Codellama 70b Instruct vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

> MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/codellama-70b-instruct-vs-mimo-v2-6-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 4

## Summary

- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Flash in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 63.1 to 33.4.

## Snapshot

| | Codellama 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 33.7 | 48.5 |
| Rank | 237 | 55 |
| Context | — | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.14 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.28 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.6 (#193)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 53.4 (#30)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1637 |
| SciCode | — | 51.3% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 40.7% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1504 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 49.6% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 65.9% | — |

## Reasoning

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 20.1 (#242)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 36.5 (#66)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1052 | 1482 |
| CritPt | — | 12% |

## Math

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 51.9 (#52)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | — | 63% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1468 |

## Knowledge

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.2 (#99)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1501 |

## Multimodal

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.5 (#47)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1259 |

## Multilingual

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.8 (#288)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.0 (#51)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 992 | 1434 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1511 |
| LMArena French | — | 1475 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1409 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1456 |

## Instruction Following

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 51.9 (#293)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 76.8 (#35)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1024 | 1463 |

## Long Context

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#57)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1463 |

## Writing & Preference

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.4 (#277)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.1 (#67)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1057 | 1455 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1400 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1451 |

## FAQ

### Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Codellama 70b Instruct or MiMo-V2.6-Flash better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.4 versus 37.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and MiMo-V2.6-Flash share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 19.