# Codellama 70b Instruct vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro

> MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/codellama-70b-instruct-vs-mimo-v2-5-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 4

## Summary

- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.5-Pro in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads 65.3 to 33.4.

## Snapshot

| | Codellama 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 33.7 | 45.2 |
| Rank | 237 | 74 |
| Context | — | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.43 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.87 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.6 (#193)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 47.4 (#60)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1479 |
| SciCode | — | 50.2% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 40.7% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1503 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 49.6% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 899.8 |
| HumanEval+ | 65.9% | — |

## Reasoning

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 20.1 (#242)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 26.8 (#130)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1052 | 1488 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 34.4% |
| CritPt | — | 4% |
| DTBench | — | 84.5% |
| LMCA | — | 29.5% |

## Math

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 40.0 (#96)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | — | 22% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1481 |

## Knowledge

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 42.2 (#98)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1503 |

## Multilingual

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.8 (#288)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 55.1 (#34)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 992 | 1449 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1507 |
| LMArena French | — | 1488 |
| LMArena German | — | 1458 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1412 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1437 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1450 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1471 |

## Instruction Following

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 51.9 (#293)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 77.5 (#21)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1024 | 1477 |

## Long Context

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 45.4 (#37)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1483 |

## Writing & Preference

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.4 (#277)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 65.3 (#49)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1057 | 1465 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1440 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1493 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1208 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1477 |

## FAQ

### Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Codellama 70b Instruct or MiMo-V2.5-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.4 versus 37.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and MiMo-V2.5-Pro share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.5-Pro has 27.