# Codellama 70b Instruct vs Longcat Flash Chat

> Longcat Flash Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 33.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/codellama-70b-instruct-vs-longcat-flash-chat
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 4

## Summary

- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher in 1 category and Longcat Flash Chat in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Longcat Flash Chat leads 61.2 to 33.6.

## Snapshot

| | Codellama 70b Instruct | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Meituan |
| Noometry Index | 33.3 | 41.5 |
| Rank | 236 | 121 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.0 (#189)
- Longcat Flash Chat: 42.9 (#85)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 40.7% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1471 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 49.6% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 65.9% | — |

## Reasoning

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 19.2 (#241)
- Longcat Flash Chat: 18.3 (#267)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1052 | 1440 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 43.9% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 17.7% |

## Math

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Longcat Flash Chat: 36.6 (#107)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1441 |

## Knowledge

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Longcat Flash Chat: 40.0 (#111)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1454 |

## Multilingual

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.9 (#283)
- Longcat Flash Chat: 52.1 (#95)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 992 | 1404 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1465 |
| LMArena French | — | 1457 |
| LMArena German | — | 1409 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1373 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1372 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1396 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1445 |

## Instruction Following

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 52.1 (#288)
- Longcat Flash Chat: 74.6 (#92)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1024 | 1411 |

## Long Context

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#89)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1425 |

## Writing & Preference

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.6 (#272)
- Longcat Flash Chat: 61.2 (#88)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1057 | 1427 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1388 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1418 |

## FAQ

### Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than Longcat Flash Chat?

Longcat Flash Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 33.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Codellama 70b Instruct or Longcat Flash Chat better for coding?

Longcat Flash Chat scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.9 versus 37.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and Longcat Flash Chat share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and Longcat Flash Chat has 19.