# Codellama 70b Instruct vs Llama 3.2 3B

> Codellama 70b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.3 to 28.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/codellama-70b-instruct-vs-llama-3-2-3b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 6

## Summary

- They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher in 2 categories and Llama 3.2 3B in 3 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Codellama 70b Instruct leads 37.0 to 27.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Complete: 49.6% for Codellama 70b Instruct and 28.3% for Llama 3.2 3B.

## Snapshot

| | Codellama 70b Instruct | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 33.3 | 28.4 |
| Rank | 236 | 318 |
| Context | — | 131K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.05 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.33 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.0 (#189)
- Llama 3.2 3B: 27.1 (#314)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 40.7% | 23.4% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 49.6% | 28.3% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1098 |
| HumanEval+ | 65.9% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Llama 3.2 3B: 19.9 (#135)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 21.9% |
| BALROG | — | 10.1% |

## Reasoning

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 19.2 (#241)
- Llama 3.2 3B: 20.1 (#225)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1052 | 1095 |

## Math

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Llama 3.2 3B: 29.9 (#213)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1126 |

## Knowledge

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Llama 3.2 3B: 29.1 (#232)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1090 |

## Multilingual

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.9 (#283)
- Llama 3.2 3B: 26.4 (#276)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 992 | 1019 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1017 |
| LMArena German | — | 1056 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 949 |

## Instruction Following

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 52.1 (#288)
- Llama 3.2 3B: 56.3 (#270)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1024 | 1089 |

## Long Context

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Llama 3.2 3B: 33.4 (#256)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1101 |

## Writing & Preference

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.6 (#272)
- Llama 3.2 3B: 24.9 (#302)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1057 | 1110 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1094 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 595 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1105 |

## FAQ

### Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than Llama 3.2 3B?

Codellama 70b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.3 to 28.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Codellama 70b Instruct or Llama 3.2 3B better for coding?

Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.0 versus 27.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and Llama 3.2 3B share?

6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.2 3B has 18.