# Codellama 70b Instruct vs Llama 3.1-70B

> Codellama 70b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.7 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/codellama-70b-instruct-vs-llama-3-1-70b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 6

## Summary

- They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher in 1 category and Llama 3.1-70B in 4 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Llama 3.1-70B leads 38.8 to 24.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Instruct: 40.7% for Codellama 70b Instruct and 46.1% for Llama 3.1-70B.

## Snapshot

| | Codellama 70b Instruct | Llama 3.1-70B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 33.7 | 29.6 |
| Rank | 237 | 308 |
| Context | — | 128K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.40 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.6 (#193)
- Llama 3.1-70B: 30.3 (#296)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Llama 3.1-70B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 40.7% | 46.1% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 49.6% | 54.8% |
| WeirdML | — | 9% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1260 |
| HumanEval+ | 65.9% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Llama 3.1-70B: 25.1 (#112)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Llama 3.1-70B |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | — | 6.9% |
| BALROG | — | 27.9% |

## Reasoning

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 20.1 (#242)
- Llama 3.1-70B: 21.6 (#220)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Llama 3.1-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1052 | 1241 |
| DTBench | — | 60% |
| LMCA | — | 14.8% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 125.92 |

## Math

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Llama 3.1-70B: 13.5 (#304)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Llama 3.1-70B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 3.6% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 21% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1252 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 36.7% |

## Knowledge

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Llama 3.1-70B: 24.2 (#269)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Llama 3.1-70B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 44.2% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 65.3% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 42.6% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1209 |
| MMLU | — | 80.1% |

## Multilingual

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.8 (#288)
- Llama 3.1-70B: 38.8 (#225)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Llama 3.1-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 992 | 1219 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1215 |
| LMArena French | — | 1261 |
| LMArena German | — | 1222 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1132 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1140 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1234 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1253 |

## Instruction Following

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 51.9 (#293)
- Llama 3.1-70B: 65.3 (#223)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Llama 3.1-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1024 | 1231 |
| IFEval | — | 82.1% |

## Long Context

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Llama 3.1-70B: 37.6 (#214)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Llama 3.1-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1241 |

## Writing & Preference

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.4 (#277)
- Llama 3.1-70B: 35.4 (#267)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Llama 3.1-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1057 | 1261 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1232 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 784 |
| WildBench | — | 75.8% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1256 |

## FAQ

### Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than Llama 3.1-70B?

Codellama 70b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.7 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Codellama 70b Instruct or Llama 3.1-70B better for coding?

Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.6 versus 30.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and Llama 3.1-70B share?

6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.1-70B has 35.