# Codellama 70b Instruct vs Llama 13b

> Codellama 70b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.7 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/codellama-70b-instruct-vs-llama-13b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 4

## Summary

- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher in 5 categories and Llama 13b in 0 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Codellama 70b Instruct leads 33.4 to 13.8.

## Snapshot

| | Codellama 70b Instruct | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 33.7 | 24.4 |
| Rank | 237 | 348 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.6 (#193)
- Llama 13b: 21.4 (#337)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 40.7% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 683 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 49.6% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 65.9% | — |

## Reasoning

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 20.1 (#242)
- Llama 13b: 14.0 (#329)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1052 | 728 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 37.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 100.58 |
| HellaSwag | — | 79.2% |
| LAMBADA | — | 75.2% |
| PIQA | — | 80.1% |
| WinoGrande | — | 73% |

## Math

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Llama 13b: 26.7 (#256)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 838 |
| GSM8K | — | 20.6% |

## Knowledge

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Llama 13b: —

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 52.7% |
| BoolQ | — | 78.7% |
| MMLU | — | 47.7% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 56.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 77.9% |

## Multimodal

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Llama 13b: —

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | — | 43.3% |

## Multilingual

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.8 (#288)
- Llama 13b: 16.6 (#297)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 992 | 819 |

## Instruction Following

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 51.9 (#293)
- Llama 13b: 36.7 (#305)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1024 | 781 |

## Writing & Preference

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.4 (#277)
- Llama 13b: 13.8 (#312)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1057 | 834 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 794 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 753 |

## FAQ

### Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than Llama 13b?

Codellama 70b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.7 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Codellama 70b Instruct or Llama 13b better for coding?

Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.6 versus 21.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and Llama 13b share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and Llama 13b has 21.