# Codellama 70b Instruct vs Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo

> Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.8 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/codellama-70b-instruct-vs-kimi-k2-thinking-turbo
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 4

## Summary

- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo in 5 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads 51.4 to 24.8.

## Snapshot

| | Codellama 70b Instruct | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Moonshot AI |
| Noometry Index | 33.7 | 45.8 |
| Rank | 237 | 70 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.6 (#193)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 38.4 (#178)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1322 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 40.7% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1454 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 49.6% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 65.9% | — |

## Reasoning

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 20.1 (#242)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 32.5 (#75)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1052 | 1428 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 20% |

## Math

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 47.4 (#68)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 83.1% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1429 |

## Knowledge

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 50.9 (#69)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 84.2% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1439 |

## Multilingual

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.8 (#288)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 51.4 (#109)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 992 | 1398 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1456 |
| LMArena French | — | 1425 |
| LMArena German | — | 1390 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1357 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1330 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1391 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1406 |

## Instruction Following

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 51.9 (#293)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 74.0 (#109)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1024 | 1403 |

## Long Context

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 43.2 (#102)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1415 |

## Writing & Preference

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.4 (#277)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 60.0 (#104)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1057 | 1415 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1374 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1414 |

## FAQ

### Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo?

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.8 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Codellama 70b Instruct or Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (37.6 vs 38.4); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo has 21.