# Codellama 70b Instruct vs Kimi K2.7 Code

> Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.3 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/codellama-70b-instruct-vs-kimi-k2-7-code
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Kimi K2.7 Code leads 39.0 to 20.1.

## Snapshot

| | Codellama 70b Instruct | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Moonshot AI |
| Noometry Index | 33.7 | 43.3 |
| Rank | 237 | 94 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.95 |
| Output $/M | — | $4 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.6 (#193)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: 42.9 (#95)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| DeepSWE | — | 30.5% |
| FrontierCode | — | 30.1% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1473 |
| SciCode | — | 47.5% |
| WeirdML | — | 54.1% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 40.7% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 49.6% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 886.23 |
| HumanEval+ | 65.9% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Kimi K2.7 Code: 24.0 (#122)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 37.6% |
| GBAEval | — | 0.9% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 5,083 |

## Reasoning

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 20.1 (#242)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: 39.0 (#61)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | — | 57.9% |
| CritPt | — | 10% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 21% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1052 | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 48.8% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 149.97 |

## Math

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Kimi K2.7 Code: 52.9 (#48)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 54% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 12.2% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 95.6% |

## Knowledge

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Kimi K2.7 Code: 53.5 (#57)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 87.9% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 36.5% |

## Multilingual

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.8 (#288)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: —

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 992 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 51.9 (#293)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: —

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1024 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.4 (#277)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: —

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1057 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than Kimi K2.7 Code?

Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.3 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Codellama 70b Instruct or Kimi K2.7 Code better for coding?

Kimi K2.7 Code scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.9 versus 37.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and Kimi K2.7 Code share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2.7 Code has 19.