# Codellama 70b Instruct vs Hunyuan T1 20250711

> Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/codellama-70b-instruct-vs-hunyuan-t1
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 4

## Summary

- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Hunyuan T1 20250711 in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads 51.2 to 24.8.
- Codellama 70b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Codellama 70b Instruct | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 33.7 | 42.5 |
| Rank | 237 | 114 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.6 (#193)
- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 40.7% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1390 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 49.6% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 65.9% | — |

## Reasoning

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 20.1 (#242)
- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1052 | 1399 |

## Math

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1414 |

## Knowledge

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1395 |

## Multilingual

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.8 (#288)
- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 992 | 1395 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1425 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1406 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1385 |

## Instruction Following

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 51.9 (#293)
- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1024 | 1374 |

## Long Context

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1384 |

## Writing & Preference

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.4 (#277)
- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1057 | 1401 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1392 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1393 |

## FAQ

### Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than Hunyuan T1 20250711?

Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Codellama 70b Instruct or Hunyuan T1 20250711 better for coding?

Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.9 versus 37.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and Hunyuan T1 20250711 share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13.