# Codellama 70b Instruct vs Grok 4.7

> Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.6 to 33.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/codellama-70b-instruct-vs-grok-4-7
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 4

## Summary

- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4.7 in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Grok 4.7 leads 70.1 to 33.6.
- Codellama 70b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Codellama 70b Instruct | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 33.3 | 46.6 |
| Rank | 236 | 56 |
| Context | — | 500K |
| Input $/M | — | $2 |
| Output $/M | — | $6 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.0 (#189)
- Grok 4.7: 55.0 (#23)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| CursorBench | — | 46.3% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1636 |
| FrontierSWE | — | 29.5% |
| SciCode | — | 57.4% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 40.7% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1423 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 49.6% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 65.9% | — |

## Reasoning

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 19.2 (#241)
- Grok 4.7: 40.1 (#49)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1052 | 1409 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 76.8% |
| CritPt | — | 17.7% |

## Math

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Grok 4.7: 41.1 (#73)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | — | 34% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1393 |

## Knowledge

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Grok 4.7: 38.7 (#130)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1413 |

## Multimodal

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Grok 4.7: 28.8 (#107)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Furniture Assembly | — | 20.8% |

## Multilingual

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.9 (#283)
- Grok 4.7: 51.2 (#108)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 992 | 1392 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1476 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1396 |

## Instruction Following

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 52.1 (#288)
- Grok 4.7: 74.3 (#98)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1024 | 1406 |

## Long Context

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Grok 4.7: 43.2 (#97)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1416 |

## Writing & Preference

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.6 (#272)
- Grok 4.7: 70.1 (#23)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1057 | 1397 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1391 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 2007 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1389 |

## FAQ

### Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than Grok 4.7?

Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.6 to 33.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Codellama 70b Instruct or Grok 4.7 better for coding?

Grok 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.0 versus 37.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and Grok 4.7 share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.7 has 21.