# Codellama 70b Instruct vs Grok 4.1

> Grok 4.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.8 to 33.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/codellama-70b-instruct-vs-grok-4-1
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 4

## Summary

- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher in 1 category and Grok 4.1 in 4 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Grok 4.1 leads 62.6 to 33.6.
- Codellama 70b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Codellama 70b Instruct | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 33.3 | 40.8 |
| Rank | 236 | 135 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.0 (#189)
- Grok 4.1: 33.4 (#246)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1214 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 40.7% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1445 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 49.6% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 65.9% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Grok 4.1: 33.8 (#47)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | — | 39% |

## Reasoning

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 19.2 (#241)
- Grok 4.1: 28.3 (#91)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1052 | 1436 |

## Math

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Grok 4.1: 36.2 (#124)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1422 |

## Knowledge

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Grok 4.1: 38.9 (#129)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1417 |

## Multilingual

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.9 (#283)
- Grok 4.1: 53.6 (#64)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 992 | 1425 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1464 |
| LMArena French | — | 1448 |
| LMArena German | — | 1447 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1396 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1407 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1434 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1438 |

## Instruction Following

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 52.1 (#288)
- Grok 4.1: 74.0 (#106)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1024 | 1400 |

## Long Context

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Grok 4.1: 43.2 (#96)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1416 |

## Writing & Preference

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.6 (#272)
- Grok 4.1: 62.6 (#71)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1057 | 1437 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1411 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1438 |

## FAQ

### Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than Grok 4.1?

Grok 4.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.8 to 33.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Codellama 70b Instruct or Grok 4.1 better for coding?

Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.0 versus 33.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and Grok 4.1 share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.1 has 19.