# Codellama 70b Instruct vs Grok 3

> Grok 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/codellama-70b-instruct-vs-grok-3
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 4

## Summary

- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher in 1 category and Grok 3 in 4 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Grok 3 leads 52.3 to 24.8.
- Codellama 70b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Codellama 70b Instruct | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 33.7 | 39.9 |
| Rank | 237 | 157 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.6 (#193)
- Grok 3: 41.9 (#115)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | — | 53.3% |
| WeirdML | — | 37.2% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 40.7% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1432 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 49.6% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 65.9% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Grok 3: 30.5 (#76)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | — | 29.5% |

## Reasoning

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 20.1 (#242)
- Grok 3: 13.7 (#333)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1052 | 1434 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0% |
| SimpleBench | — | 36.1% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 61.3% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 5.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 138.33 |

## Math

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Grok 3: 38.0 (#145)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 55.6% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 46.4% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1391 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 88.7% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 3.8% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 0% |

## Knowledge

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Grok 3: 46.2 (#82)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 75.8% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 78.8% |
| Confabulations | — | 14.2% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.8% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 65% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1421 |

## Multilingual

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.8 (#288)
- Grok 3: 52.3 (#87)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 992 | 1410 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1448 |
| LMArena French | — | 1460 |
| LMArena German | — | 1431 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1387 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1373 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1416 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1417 |

## Instruction Following

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 51.9 (#293)
- Grok 3: 75.0 (#73)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1024 | 1409 |
| IFEval | — | 88.4% |

## Long Context

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Grok 3: 38.7 (#192)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 58.3% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1439 |

## Writing & Preference

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.4 (#277)
- Grok 3: 55.8 (#141)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1057 | 1426 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1414 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 76.4% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1186 |
| WildBench | — | 84.9% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1425 |

## FAQ

### Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than Grok 3?

Grok 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Codellama 70b Instruct or Grok 3 better for coding?

Grok 3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.9 versus 37.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and Grok 3 share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and Grok 3 has 40.