# Codellama 70b Instruct vs Granite 3.1 2b Instruct

> Codellama 70b Instruct and Granite 3.1 2b Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (33.7 vs 33.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/codellama-70b-instruct-vs-granite-3-1-2b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 4

## Summary

- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher in 1 category and Granite 3.1 2b Instruct in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in instruction following, where Granite 3.1 2b Instruct leads 57.7 to 51.9.

## Snapshot

| | Codellama 70b Instruct | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | IBM |
| Noometry Index | 33.7 | 33.2 |
| Rank | 237 | 247 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.6 (#193)
- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 33.4 (#257)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 40.7% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1149 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 49.6% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 65.9% | — |

## Reasoning

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 20.1 (#242)
- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 22.0 (#209)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1052 | 1138 |

## Math

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 33.1 (#206)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1159 |

## Knowledge

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 30.8 (#224)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1131 |

## Multilingual

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.8 (#288)
- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 29.1 (#269)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 992 | 1068 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1139 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1063 |

## Instruction Following

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 51.9 (#293)
- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 57.7 (#264)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1024 | 1116 |

## Long Context

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 35.0 (#244)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1155 |

## Writing & Preference

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.4 (#277)
- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 34.1 (#274)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1057 | 1127 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1116 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1099 |

## FAQ

### Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than Granite 3.1 2b Instruct?

Codellama 70b Instruct and Granite 3.1 2b Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (33.7 vs 33.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Codellama 70b Instruct or Granite 3.1 2b Instruct better for coding?

Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.6 versus 33.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and Granite 3.1 2b Instruct share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and Granite 3.1 2b Instruct has 12.