# Codellama 70b Instruct vs Granite 3.0 2b Instruct

> Codellama 70b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.3 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/codellama-70b-instruct-vs-granite-3-0-2b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 5

## Summary

- They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher in 2 categories and Granite 3.0 2b Instruct in 3 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Codellama 70b Instruct leads 37.0 to 27.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Instruct: 40.7% for Codellama 70b Instruct and 20.5% for Granite 3.0 2b Instruct.

## Snapshot

| | Codellama 70b Instruct | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | IBM |
| Noometry Index | 33.3 | 30.2 |
| Rank | 236 | 284 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.0 (#189)
- Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 27.8 (#311)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 40.7% | 20.5% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1090 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 49.6% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 65.9% | — |

## Reasoning

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 19.2 (#241)
- Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 19.6 (#234)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1052 | 1073 |

## Math

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.7 (#215)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1117 |

## Knowledge

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 28.4 (#238)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1064 |

## Multilingual

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.9 (#283)
- Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 27.1 (#273)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 992 | 1033 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1070 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1045 |

## Instruction Following

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 52.1 (#288)
- Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 54.2 (#279)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1024 | 1056 |

## Long Context

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 32.5 (#263)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1071 |

## Writing & Preference

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.6 (#272)
- Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.8 (#287)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1057 | 1080 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1046 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1053 |

## FAQ

### Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than Granite 3.0 2b Instruct?

Codellama 70b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.3 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Codellama 70b Instruct or Granite 3.0 2b Instruct better for coding?

Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.0 versus 27.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and Granite 3.0 2b Instruct share?

5 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and Granite 3.0 2b Instruct has 13.