# Codellama 70b Instruct vs GLM-4.6V

> GLM-4.6V is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/codellama-70b-instruct-vs-glm-4-6v
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 4

## Summary

- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and GLM-4.6V in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where GLM-4.6V leads 48.6 to 24.8.

## Snapshot

| | Codellama 70b Instruct | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Z.ai (Zhipu) |
| Noometry Index | 33.7 | 41.3 |
| Rank | 237 | 137 |
| Context | — | 128K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.30 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.90 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.6 (#193)
- GLM-4.6V: 40.9 (#128)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 40.7% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1390 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 49.6% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 65.9% | — |

## Reasoning

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 20.1 (#242)
- GLM-4.6V: 27.6 (#115)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1052 | 1368 |

## Knowledge

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- GLM-4.6V: 38.0 (#149)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1371 |

## Multimodal

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- GLM-4.6V: 34.8 (#90)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1164 |

## Multilingual

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.8 (#288)
- GLM-4.6V: 48.6 (#141)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 992 | 1359 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1425 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1340 |

## Instruction Following

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 51.9 (#293)
- GLM-4.6V: 71.4 (#151)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1024 | 1352 |

## Long Context

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- GLM-4.6V: 41.3 (#143)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1358 |

## Writing & Preference

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.4 (#277)
- GLM-4.6V: 56.6 (#137)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1057 | 1377 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1347 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1360 |

## FAQ

### Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than GLM-4.6V?

GLM-4.6V is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Codellama 70b Instruct or GLM-4.6V better for coding?

GLM-4.6V scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.9 versus 37.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and GLM-4.6V share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.6V has 12.