# Codellama 70b Instruct vs GLM-4.5V

> GLM-4.5V is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.2 to 33.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/codellama-70b-instruct-vs-glm-4-5v
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 4

## Summary

- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and GLM-4.5V in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where GLM-4.5V leads 44.9 to 24.9.

## Snapshot

| | Codellama 70b Instruct | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Z.ai (Zhipu) |
| Noometry Index | 33.3 | 39.2 |
| Rank | 236 | 158 |
| Context | — | 64K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.60 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.80 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.0 (#189)
- GLM-4.5V: 38.9 (#152)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 40.7% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1347 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 49.6% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 65.9% | — |

## Reasoning

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 19.2 (#241)
- GLM-4.5V: 26.5 (#118)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1052 | 1335 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 59.8% |

## Math

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- GLM-4.5V: 34.7 (#157)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1353 |

## Knowledge

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- GLM-4.5V: 36.8 (#155)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1353 |

## Multimodal

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- GLM-4.5V: 33.6 (#86)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1154 |

## Multilingual

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.9 (#283)
- GLM-4.5V: 44.9 (#172)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 992 | 1304 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1338 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1299 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1335 |

## Instruction Following

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 52.1 (#288)
- GLM-4.5V: 69.4 (#170)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1024 | 1311 |

## Long Context

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- GLM-4.5V: 39.6 (#166)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1305 |

## Writing & Preference

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.6 (#272)
- GLM-4.5V: 52.7 (#162)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1057 | 1333 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1295 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1333 |

## FAQ

### Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than GLM-4.5V?

GLM-4.5V is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.2 to 33.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Codellama 70b Instruct or GLM-4.5V better for coding?

GLM-4.5V scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.9 versus 37.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and GLM-4.5V share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.5V has 15.