# Codellama 70b Instruct vs Gemma 7B

> Codellama 70b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.3 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/codellama-70b-instruct-vs-gemma-7b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 5

## Summary

- They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher in 4 categories and Gemma 7B in 1 category; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Codellama 70b Instruct leads 37.0 to 29.9.

## Snapshot

| | Codellama 70b Instruct | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Google |
| Noometry Index | 33.3 | 29.5 |
| Rank | 236 | 295 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.0 (#189)
- Gemma 7B: 29.9 (#290)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| HumanEval+ | 65.9% | 28.7% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 40.7% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1048 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 49.6% | — |
| MBPP+ | — | 43.4% |

## Reasoning

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 19.2 (#241)
- Gemma 7B: 19.0 (#247)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1052 | 1042 |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 48.7% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 55.1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 111.74 |
| HellaSwag | — | 82.2% |
| PIQA | — | 81.2% |
| WinoGrande | — | 79% |

## Math

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Gemma 7B: 28.7 (#225)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1066 |
| GSM8K | — | 46.4% |

## Knowledge

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Gemma 7B: 26.8 (#248)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1002 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 78.3% |
| BoolQ | — | 83.2% |
| MMLU | — | 66.1% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 78.6% |
| TriviaQA | — | 72.3% |

## Multilingual

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.9 (#283)
- Gemma 7B: 25.3 (#282)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 992 | 999 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1035 |
| LMArena French | — | 1024 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 993 |

## Instruction Following

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 52.1 (#288)
- Gemma 7B: 51.7 (#290)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1024 | 1017 |

## Long Context

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Gemma 7B: 31.1 (#277)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1022 |

## Writing & Preference

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.6 (#272)
- Gemma 7B: 27.2 (#297)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1057 | 1056 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1024 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 963 |

## FAQ

### Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than Gemma 7B?

Codellama 70b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.3 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Codellama 70b Instruct or Gemma 7B better for coding?

Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.0 versus 29.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and Gemma 7B share?

5 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 7B has 27.