# Codellama 70b Instruct vs Gemma 2B

> Codellama 70b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.7 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/codellama-70b-instruct-vs-gemma-2b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 5

## Summary

- They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher in 5 categories and Gemma 2B in 0 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Codellama 70b Instruct leads 33.4 to 24.0.

## Snapshot

| | Codellama 70b Instruct | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Google |
| Noometry Index | 33.7 | 29.6 |
| Rank | 237 | 307 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.6 (#193)
- Gemma 2B: 29.4 (#305)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| HumanEval+ | 65.9% | 20.7% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 40.7% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1010 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 49.6% | — |
| MBPP+ | — | 34.1% |

## Reasoning

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 20.1 (#242)
- Gemma 2B: 18.8 (#275)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1052 | 989 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 35.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 94.2 |
| HellaSwag | — | 71.4% |
| PIQA | — | 77.3% |
| WinoGrande | — | 65.4% |

## Math

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Gemma 2B: 30.0 (#239)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1009 |
| GSM8K | — | 17.7% |

## Knowledge

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Gemma 2B: —

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 42.1% |
| BoolQ | — | 69.4% |
| MMLU | — | 42.3% |
| TriviaQA | — | 53.2% |

## Multilingual

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.8 (#288)
- Gemma 2B: 23.0 (#294)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 992 | 958 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 986 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 937 |

## Instruction Following

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 51.9 (#293)
- Gemma 2B: 48.5 (#302)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1024 | 970 |

## Long Context

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#291)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 981 |

## Writing & Preference

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.4 (#277)
- Gemma 2B: 24.0 (#308)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1057 | 1002 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 987 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 945 |

## FAQ

### Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than Gemma 2B?

Codellama 70b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.7 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Codellama 70b Instruct or Gemma 2B better for coding?

Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.6 versus 29.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and Gemma 2B share?

5 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 2B has 23.