# Codellama 70b Instruct vs Gemma 2 27B

> Codellama 70b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.3 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/codellama-70b-instruct-vs-gemma-2-27b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 6

## Summary

- They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher in 2 categories and Gemma 2 27B in 3 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Gemma 2 27B leads 38.8 to 24.9.

## Snapshot

| | Codellama 70b Instruct | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Google |
| Noometry Index | 33.3 | 29.2 |
| Rank | 236 | 302 |
| Context | — | 8K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.65 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.65 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.0 (#189)
- Gemma 2 27B: 33.5 (#243)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 40.7% | 42.8% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 49.6% | 52.5% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 36% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1211 |
| HumanEval+ | 65.9% | — |

## Reasoning

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 19.2 (#241)
- Gemma 2 27B: 14.8 (#313)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1052 | 1199 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 28.1% |
| DTBench | — | 48% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 47.9% |
| LMCA | — | 7.1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 122.06 |
| LiveBench | — | 38.2% |

## Math

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Gemma 2 27B: 10.0 (#306)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 1.4% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 26.5% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1212 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 27.9% |

## Knowledge

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Gemma 2 27B: 18.9 (#275)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 36.5% |
| Confabulations | — | 27.1% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1172 |
| MMLU | — | 75.7% |

## Multilingual

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.9 (#283)
- Gemma 2 27B: 38.8 (#221)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 992 | 1217 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1221 |
| LMArena French | — | 1246 |
| LMArena German | — | 1209 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1175 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1174 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1234 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1228 |

## Instruction Following

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 52.1 (#288)
- Gemma 2 27B: 60.7 (#244)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1024 | 1206 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 58.1% |

## Long Context

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Gemma 2 27B: 37.3 (#213)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1231 |

## Writing & Preference

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.6 (#272)
- Gemma 2 27B: 44.4 (#220)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1057 | 1231 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1241 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1224 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 32.6% |

## FAQ

### Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than Gemma 2 27B?

Codellama 70b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.3 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Codellama 70b Instruct or Gemma 2 27B better for coding?

Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.0 versus 33.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and Gemma 2 27B share?

6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 2 27B has 34.