# Codellama 70b Instruct vs Gemini 2.0 Pro

> Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 33.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/codellama-70b-instruct-vs-gemini-2-0-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in instruction following, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 75.6 to 52.1.
- Codellama 70b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Codellama 70b Instruct | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Google |
| Noometry Index | 33.3 | 38.6 |
| Rank | 236 | 171 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.0 (#189)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.4 (#182)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | — | 35.6% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 40.7% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 63.5% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 49.6% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 65.9% | — |

## Reasoning

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 19.2 (#241)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 21.6 (#194)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | — | 0.7% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 60.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1052 | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 68% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 135.06 |
| LiveBench | — | 65.1% |

## Math

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.1 (#101)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | — | 71% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 83.5% |

## Knowledge

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#156)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 65.7% |
| Confabulations | — | 18.4% |

## Multilingual

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.9 (#283)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 992 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 52.1 (#288)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.6 (#57)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 83.4% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1024 | — |

## Long Context

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.1 (#287)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 41.7% |

## Writing & Preference

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.6 (#272)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#164)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1057 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 44.9% |

## FAQ

### Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than Gemini 2.0 Pro?

Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 33.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Codellama 70b Instruct or Gemini 2.0 Pro better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (37.0 vs 37.4); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and Gemini 2.0 Pro share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14.