# Codellama 70b Instruct vs ERNIE 5.1

> ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/codellama-70b-instruct-vs-ernie-5-1
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 4

## Summary

- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and ERNIE 5.1 in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where ERNIE 5.1 leads 65.1 to 33.4.
- Codellama 70b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Codellama 70b Instruct | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Baidu |
| Noometry Index | 33.7 | 43.8 |
| Rank | 237 | 83 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.6 (#193)
- ERNIE 5.1: 44.0 (#76)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 40.7% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1488 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 49.6% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 65.9% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- ERNIE 5.1: —

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Search | — | 1227 |

## Reasoning

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 20.1 (#242)
- ERNIE 5.1: 21.9 (#211)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1052 | 1481 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 23.4% |

## Math

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- ERNIE 5.1: 40.3 (#92)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1481 |

## Knowledge

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- ERNIE 5.1: 41.9 (#102)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1492 |

## Multilingual

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.8 (#288)
- ERNIE 5.1: 55.5 (#29)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 992 | 1454 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1508 |
| LMArena French | — | 1488 |
| LMArena German | — | 1470 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1422 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1427 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1459 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1473 |

## Instruction Following

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 51.9 (#293)
- ERNIE 5.1: 76.7 (#37)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1024 | 1460 |

## Long Context

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- ERNIE 5.1: 44.7 (#59)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1462 |

## Writing & Preference

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.4 (#277)
- ERNIE 5.1: 65.1 (#52)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1057 | 1468 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1441 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1471 |

## FAQ

### Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than ERNIE 5.1?

ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Codellama 70b Instruct or ERNIE 5.1 better for coding?

ERNIE 5.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 37.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and ERNIE 5.1 share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and ERNIE 5.1 has 19.