# Codellama 70b Instruct vs Command A

> Command A is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 33.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/codellama-70b-instruct-vs-command-a
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 4

## Summary

- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher in 2 categories and Command A in 3 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Command A leads 45.5 to 24.9.

## Snapshot

| | Codellama 70b Instruct | Command A |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Cohere |
| Noometry Index | 33.3 | 35.9 |
| Rank | 236 | 212 |
| Context | — | 256K |
| Input $/M | — | $2.50 |
| Output $/M | — | $10 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.0 (#189)
- Command A: 26.8 (#317)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Command A |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | — | 12% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 40.7% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1331 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 49.6% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 65.9% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Command A: 35.7 (#36)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Command A |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 57.1% |

## Reasoning

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 19.2 (#241)
- Command A: 17.7 (#276)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Command A |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1052 | 1326 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 28.8% |
| DTBench | — | 61.3% |
| LMCA | — | 10.3% |

## Math

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Command A: 33.5 (#172)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Command A |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1300 |

## Knowledge

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Command A: 36.5 (#157)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Command A |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 9.3% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1295 |

## Multilingual

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.9 (#283)
- Command A: 45.5 (#166)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Command A |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 992 | 1313 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1327 |
| LMArena French | — | 1352 |
| LMArena German | — | 1341 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1283 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1285 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1314 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1346 |

## Instruction Following

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 52.1 (#288)
- Command A: 69.3 (#172)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Command A |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1024 | 1309 |

## Long Context

- Codellama 70b Instruct: —
- Command A: 40.6 (#147)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Command A |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1334 |

## Writing & Preference

- Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.6 (#272)
- Command A: 47.8 (#204)

| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Command A |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1057 | 1331 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1319 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1145 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1338 |

## FAQ

### Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than Command A?

Command A is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 33.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Codellama 70b Instruct or Command A better for coding?

Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.0 versus 26.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and Command A share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and Command A has 24.