# Codellama 34b Instruct vs QwQ-32B

> QwQ-32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/codellama-34b-instruct-vs-qwq-32b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 34b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and QwQ-32B in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where QwQ-32B leads 50.9 to 28.4.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Complete: 37.1% for Codellama 34b Instruct and 54.4% for QwQ-32B.

## Snapshot

| | Codellama 34b Instruct | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 30.2 | 39.4 |
| Rank | 285 | 153 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.0 (#310)
- QwQ-32B: 34.9 (#220)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 29% | 44.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1046 | 1333 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 37.1% | 54.4% |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 20.9% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 72.2% |
| HumanEval+ | 43.9% | — |
| MBPP+ | 56.3% | — |

## Reasoning

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 18.8 (#250)
- QwQ-32B: 22.9 (#171)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1032 | 1326 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 5% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 83.5% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 65% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 137.6 |
| ForecastBench | — | 58.3 |
| LiveBench | — | 72% |

## Math

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.5 (#227)
- QwQ-32B: 36.2 (#123)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1056 | 1359 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 59.2% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 77.8% |

## Knowledge

- Codellama 34b Instruct: —
- QwQ-32B: 37.2 (#150)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 65.3% |
| Confabulations | — | 15.6% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1323 |

## Multilingual

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 25.9 (#279)
- QwQ-32B: 45.0 (#171)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1011 | 1306 |
| LMArena Chinese | 976 | 1378 |
| LMArena French | — | 1337 |
| LMArena German | — | 1313 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1263 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1278 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1297 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1353 |

## Instruction Following

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 52.4 (#286)
- QwQ-32B: 72.8 (#131)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1028 | 1297 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 81.8% |

## Long Context

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 30.8 (#279)
- QwQ-32B: 49.0 (#11)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1014 | 1308 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 83.3% |

## Writing & Preference

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.4 (#292)
- QwQ-32B: 50.9 (#175)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1066 | 1329 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1032 | 1288 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1015 | 1314 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 80.2% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1257 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 51.4% |

## FAQ

### Is Codellama 34b Instruct better than QwQ-32B?

QwQ-32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Codellama 34b Instruct or QwQ-32B better for coding?

QwQ-32B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.9 versus 28.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Codellama 34b Instruct and QwQ-32B share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 34b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and QwQ-32B has 36.