# Codellama 34b Instruct vs Qwen3.7 Flash

> Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/codellama-34b-instruct-vs-qwen3-7-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.7 Flash leads 28.2 to 19.6.
- Codellama 34b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 30.8 | 39.9 |
| Rank | 287 | 156 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.03 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.13 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.5 (#314)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 29% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1046 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 37.1% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 43.9% | — |
| MBPP+ | 56.3% | — |

## Reasoning

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 19.6 (#255)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 28.2 (#108)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 43.8% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 23% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1032 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 15% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 144.64 |

## Math

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 31.0 (#230)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 38.3 (#140)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 19.3% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 86.7% |
| LMArena Math | 1056 | — |

## Knowledge

- Codellama 34b Instruct: —
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#75)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 82.3% |

## Multilingual

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 25.8 (#284)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1011 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 976 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 52.2 (#291)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1028 | — |

## Long Context

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 30.9 (#284)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1013 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.2 (#297)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1066 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1032 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1015 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Codellama 34b Instruct better than Qwen3.7 Flash?

Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Codellama 34b Instruct and Qwen3.7 Flash share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 34b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Flash has 7.