# Codellama 34b Instruct vs Qwen3.6 35B-A3B

> Qwen3.6 35B-A3B is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.2 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/codellama-34b-instruct-vs-qwen3-6-35b-a3b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.6 35B-A3B leads 37.9 to 28.5.

## Snapshot

| | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen3.6 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 30.2 | 37.2 |
| Rank | 285 | 194 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.25 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.49 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.0 (#310)
- Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: 36.7 (#190)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen3.6 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 35.8% |
| WeirdML | — | 34.5% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 29% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1046 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 37.1% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 43.9% | — |
| MBPP+ | 56.3% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Codellama 34b Instruct: —
- Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: 21.9 (#126)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen3.6 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 23% |

## Reasoning

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 18.8 (#250)
- Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: 27.2 (#112)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen3.6 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 41.6% |
| CritPt | — | 0.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 26% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1032 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 22% |
| DTBench | — | 73.9% |
| LMCA | — | 29.7% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 44.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 143.92 |

## Math

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.5 (#227)
- Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: 37.9 (#90)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen3.6 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 20.4% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 86.7% |
| LMArena Math | 1056 | — |

## Knowledge

- Codellama 34b Instruct: —
- Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: 51.4 (#63)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen3.6 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 84.8% |

## Multilingual

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 25.9 (#279)
- Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: —

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen3.6 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1011 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 976 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 52.4 (#286)
- Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: —

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen3.6 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1028 | — |

## Long Context

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 30.8 (#279)
- Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: —

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen3.6 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1014 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.4 (#292)
- Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: —

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen3.6 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1066 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1032 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1015 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Codellama 34b Instruct better than Qwen3.6 35B-A3B?

Qwen3.6 35B-A3B is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.2 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Codellama 34b Instruct or Qwen3.6 35B-A3B better for coding?

Qwen3.6 35B-A3B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.7 versus 28.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Codellama 34b Instruct and Qwen3.6 35B-A3B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 34b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 35B-A3B has 14.