# Codellama 34b Instruct vs Qwen3.6 27B

> Qwen3.6 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.2 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/codellama-34b-instruct-vs-qwen3-6-27b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.6 27B leads 50.3 to 28.2.

## Snapshot

| | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 30.8 | 42.2 |
| Rank | 287 | 117 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.60 |
| Output $/M | — | $3.60 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.5 (#314)
- Qwen3.6 27B: 39.1 (#163)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 37.3% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 29% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1046 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 37.1% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 43.9% | — |
| MBPP+ | 56.3% | — |

## Reasoning

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 19.6 (#255)
- Qwen3.6 27B: 25.0 (#153)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0.9% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 22% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1032 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 7% |
| DTBench | — | 78.1% |
| LMCA | — | 34.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 146.5 |

## Math

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 31.0 (#230)
- Qwen3.6 27B: 48.5 (#62)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 35.1% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 91.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1056 | — |

## Knowledge

- Codellama 34b Instruct: —
- Qwen3.6 27B: 52.4 (#63)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 85.9% |

## Multilingual

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 25.8 (#284)
- Qwen3.6 27B: —

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1011 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 976 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 52.2 (#291)
- Qwen3.6 27B: —

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1028 | — |

## Long Context

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 30.9 (#284)
- Qwen3.6 27B: —

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1013 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.2 (#297)
- Qwen3.6 27B: 50.3 (#181)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1066 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1032 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1026 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1015 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Codellama 34b Instruct better than Qwen3.6 27B?

Qwen3.6 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.2 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Codellama 34b Instruct or Qwen3.6 27B better for coding?

Qwen3.6 27B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.1 versus 28.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Codellama 34b Instruct and Qwen3.6 27B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 34b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 27B has 11.