# Codellama 34b Instruct vs Qwen3.5-Flash

> Qwen3.5-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/codellama-34b-instruct-vs-qwen3-5-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 34b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.5-Flash in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.5-Flash leads 58.2 to 28.4.
- Codellama 34b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 30.2 | 42.3 |
| Rank | 285 | 105 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.10 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.40 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.0 (#310)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 33.9 (#234)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1046 | 1412 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1243 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 29% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 37.1% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 221.8 |
| HumanEval+ | 43.9% | — |
| MBPP+ | 56.3% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Codellama 34b Instruct: —
- Qwen3.5-Flash: —

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 462.69 |

## Reasoning

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 18.8 (#250)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 32.9 (#63)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1032 | 1404 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 21% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 20% |
| DTBench | — | 82.9% |
| LMCA | — | 29.1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 143.98 |

## Math

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.5 (#227)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 36.3 (#117)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1056 | 1407 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 18.2% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 84.4% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 6.2% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 0% |

## Knowledge

- Codellama 34b Instruct: —
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 43.2 (#84)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 82.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 20.3% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 10.5% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1408 |

## Multilingual

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 25.9 (#279)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 50.7 (#116)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1011 | 1385 |
| LMArena Chinese | 976 | 1446 |
| LMArena French | — | 1412 |
| LMArena German | — | 1389 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1369 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1344 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1379 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1399 |

## Instruction Following

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 52.4 (#286)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 72.8 (#133)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1028 | 1374 |

## Long Context

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 30.8 (#279)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 42.4 (#119)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1014 | 1392 |

## Writing & Preference

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.4 (#292)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 58.2 (#117)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1066 | 1397 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1032 | 1343 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1015 | 1393 |

## FAQ

### Is Codellama 34b Instruct better than Qwen3.5-Flash?

Qwen3.5-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Codellama 34b Instruct or Qwen3.5-Flash better for coding?

Qwen3.5-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.9 versus 28.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Codellama 34b Instruct and Qwen3.5-Flash share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 34b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5-Flash has 32.