# Codellama 34b Instruct vs Qwen3.5-9B

> Qwen3.5-9B is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.3 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/codellama-34b-instruct-vs-qwen3-5-9b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in coding, where Qwen3.5-9B leads 35.3 to 28.0.

## Snapshot

| | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 30.2 | 33.3 |
| Rank | 285 | 235 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.10 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.15 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.0 (#310)
- Qwen3.5-9B: 35.3 (#213)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 27.5% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 29% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1046 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 37.1% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 43.9% | — |
| MBPP+ | 56.3% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Codellama 34b Instruct: —
- Qwen3.5-9B: 14.4 (#143)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 9.2% |

## Reasoning

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 18.8 (#250)
- Qwen3.5-9B: 22.5 (#178)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 12% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1032 | — |
| DTBench | — | 71.2% |
| LMCA | — | 24.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 139.45 |

## Math

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.5 (#227)
- Qwen3.5-9B: 33.5 (#174)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 48.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 61.7% |
| LMArena Math | 1056 | — |

## Knowledge

- Codellama 34b Instruct: —
- Qwen3.5-9B: 46.0 (#77)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 79% |

## Multilingual

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 25.9 (#279)
- Qwen3.5-9B: —

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1011 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 976 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 52.4 (#286)
- Qwen3.5-9B: —

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1028 | — |

## Long Context

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 30.8 (#279)
- Qwen3.5-9B: —

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1014 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.4 (#292)
- Qwen3.5-9B: —

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1066 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1032 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1015 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Codellama 34b Instruct better than Qwen3.5-9B?

Qwen3.5-9B is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.3 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Codellama 34b Instruct or Qwen3.5-9B better for coding?

Qwen3.5-9B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.3 versus 28.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Codellama 34b Instruct and Qwen3.5-9B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 34b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5-9B has 10.