# Codellama 34b Instruct vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

> Codellama 34b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.2 to 28.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/codellama-34b-instruct-vs-qwen2-5-7b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 34b Instruct scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct in 3 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen2.5 7B Instruct leads 48.8 to 28.4.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Complete: 37.1% for Codellama 34b Instruct and 46.1% for Qwen2.5 7B Instruct.

## Snapshot

| | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 30.2 | 28.6 |
| Rank | 285 | 314 |
| Context | — | 131K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.17 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.70 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.0 (#310)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 35.9 (#204)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 29% | 37.6% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 37.1% | 46.1% |
| LMArena Coding | 1046 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 43.9% | — |
| MBPP+ | 56.3% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Codellama 34b Instruct: —
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 23.5 (#117)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | — | 7.8% |

## Reasoning

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 18.8 (#250)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 14.3 (#317)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1032 | — |
| DTBench | — | 47.7% |
| LMCA | — | 6.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 118.44 |

## Math

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.5 (#227)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 11.8 (#300)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 2.5% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 29.4% |
| LMArena Math | 1056 | — |

## Knowledge

- Codellama 34b Instruct: —
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 17.0 (#281)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 35.5% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 53.9% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 34.1% |
| MMLU | — | 72.9% |

## Multilingual

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 25.9 (#279)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1011 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 976 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 52.4 (#286)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 63.4 (#226)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | — | 74.1% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1028 | — |

## Long Context

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 30.8 (#279)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1014 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.4 (#292)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 48.8 (#194)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1066 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1032 | — |
| WildBench | — | 73.1% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1015 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Codellama 34b Instruct better than Qwen2.5 7B Instruct?

Codellama 34b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.2 to 28.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Codellama 34b Instruct or Qwen2.5 7B Instruct better for coding?

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.9 versus 28.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Codellama 34b Instruct and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 34b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has 15.