# Codellama 34b Instruct vs Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

> Codellama 34b Instruct and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.2 vs 29.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/codellama-34b-instruct-vs-qwen2-5-32b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 34b Instruct scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct in 1 category; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Codellama 34b Instruct leads 28.5 to 15.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Instruct: 29% for Codellama 34b Instruct and 45% for Qwen2.5 32B Instruct.

## Snapshot

| | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 30.2 | 29.7 |
| Rank | 285 | 291 |
| Context | — | 131K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.70 |
| Output $/M | — | $2.80 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.0 (#310)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 38.1 (#165)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 29% | 45% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 37.1% | 52.3% |
| LMArena Coding | 1046 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 43.9% | — |
| MBPP+ | 56.3% | — |

## Reasoning

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 18.8 (#250)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 18.5 (#262)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1032 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 128.52 |

## Math

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.5 (#227)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 15.3 (#289)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 7.4% |
| LMArena Math | 1056 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 56.1% |

## Knowledge

- Codellama 34b Instruct: —
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 24.9 (#259)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 46.1% |

## Multilingual

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 25.9 (#279)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1011 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 976 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 52.4 (#286)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1028 | — |

## Long Context

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 30.8 (#279)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1014 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.4 (#292)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1066 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1032 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1015 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Codellama 34b Instruct better than Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?

Codellama 34b Instruct and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.2 vs 29.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Codellama 34b Instruct or Qwen2.5 32B Instruct better for coding?

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.1 versus 28.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Codellama 34b Instruct and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 34b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct has 7.