# Codellama 34b Instruct vs Qwen2.5 14B Instruct

> Codellama 34b Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#287); Qwen2.5 14B Instruct does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/codellama-34b-instruct-vs-qwen2-5-14b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 34b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Qwen2.5 14B Instruct leads 37.7 to 28.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Complete: 37.1% for Codellama 34b Instruct and 52.2% for Qwen2.5 14B Instruct.

## Snapshot

| | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 30.8 | 38.7 |
| Rank | 287 | — |
| Context | — | 131K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.35 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.40 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.5 (#314)
- Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: 37.7 (#191)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 29% | 39.8% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 37.1% | 52.2% |
| LMArena Coding | 1046 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 43.9% | — |
| MBPP+ | 56.3% | — |

## Reasoning

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 19.6 (#255)
- Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1032 | — |

## Math

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 31.0 (#230)
- Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1056 | — |

## Knowledge

- Codellama 34b Instruct: —
- Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | — | 79.9% |

## Multilingual

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 25.8 (#284)
- Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1011 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 976 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 52.2 (#291)
- Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1028 | — |

## Long Context

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 30.9 (#284)
- Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1013 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.2 (#297)
- Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1066 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1032 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1015 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Codellama 34b Instruct better than Qwen2.5 14B Instruct?

Codellama 34b Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#287); Qwen2.5 14B Instruct does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

### Is Codellama 34b Instruct or Qwen2.5 14B Instruct better for coding?

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.7 versus 28.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Codellama 34b Instruct and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 34b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct has 3.