# Codellama 34b Instruct vs Qwen1.5-72B

> Codellama 34b Instruct and Qwen1.5-72B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.8 vs 30.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/codellama-34b-instruct-vs-qwen1-5-72b
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 14

## Summary

- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 34b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen1.5-72B in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen1.5-72B leads 37.3 to 28.2.

## Snapshot

| | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 30.8 | 30.8 |
| Rank | 287 | 285 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.5 (#314)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 31.9 (#277)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 29% | 33.2% |
| LMArena Coding | 1046 | 1165 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 37.1% | 40.3% |
| HumanEval+ | 43.9% | 59.1% |
| MBPP+ | 56.3% | 61.6% |

## Reasoning

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 19.6 (#255)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 22.2 (#203)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1032 | 1148 |

## Math

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 31.0 (#230)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 33.2 (#205)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1056 | 1164 |

## Knowledge

- Codellama 34b Instruct: —
- Qwen1.5-72B: 11.5 (#300)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 28.8% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1136 |

## Multilingual

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 25.8 (#284)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 33.2 (#253)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1011 | 1135 |
| LMArena Chinese | 976 | 1186 |
| LMArena French | — | 1159 |
| LMArena German | — | 1084 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1061 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1050 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1104 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1110 |

## Instruction Following

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 52.2 (#291)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 59.3 (#256)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1028 | 1141 |

## Long Context

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 30.9 (#284)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 35.1 (#243)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1013 | 1157 |

## Writing & Preference

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.2 (#297)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 37.3 (#258)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1066 | 1166 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1032 | 1137 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1015 | 1160 |

## FAQ

### Is Codellama 34b Instruct better than Qwen1.5-72B?

Codellama 34b Instruct and Qwen1.5-72B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.8 vs 30.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Codellama 34b Instruct or Qwen1.5-72B better for coding?

Qwen1.5-72B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 31.9 versus 28.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Codellama 34b Instruct and Qwen1.5-72B share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 34b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-72B has 22.