# Codellama 34b Instruct vs Qwen1.5-32B

> Codellama 34b Instruct and Qwen1.5-32B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.8 vs 30.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/codellama-34b-instruct-vs-qwen1-5-32b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 34b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen1.5-32B in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen1.5-32B leads 34.2 to 28.2.

## Snapshot

| | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 30.8 | 30.5 |
| Rank | 287 | 293 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.5 (#314)
- Qwen1.5-32B: 31.7 (#282)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 29% | 32.3% |
| LMArena Coding | 1046 | 1155 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 37.1% | 42% |
| HumanEval+ | 43.9% | — |
| MBPP+ | 56.3% | — |

## Reasoning

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 19.6 (#255)
- Qwen1.5-32B: 21.8 (#212)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1032 | 1130 |

## Math

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 31.0 (#230)
- Qwen1.5-32B: 33.0 (#207)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1056 | 1155 |

## Knowledge

- Codellama 34b Instruct: —
- Qwen1.5-32B: 13.5 (#296)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 30.7% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1126 |
| MMLU | — | 74.4% |

## Multilingual

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 25.8 (#284)
- Qwen1.5-32B: 31.4 (#259)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1011 | 1106 |
| LMArena Chinese | 976 | 1177 |
| LMArena French | — | 1101 |
| LMArena German | — | 1058 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1027 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1008 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1073 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1089 |

## Instruction Following

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 52.2 (#291)
- Qwen1.5-32B: 57.7 (#265)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1028 | 1116 |

## Long Context

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 30.9 (#284)
- Qwen1.5-32B: 34.7 (#246)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1013 | 1146 |

## Writing & Preference

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.2 (#297)
- Qwen1.5-32B: 34.2 (#271)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1066 | 1137 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1032 | 1083 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1015 | 1140 |

## FAQ

### Is Codellama 34b Instruct better than Qwen1.5-32B?

Codellama 34b Instruct and Qwen1.5-32B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.8 vs 30.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Codellama 34b Instruct or Qwen1.5-32B better for coding?

Qwen1.5-32B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 31.7 versus 28.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Codellama 34b Instruct and Qwen1.5-32B share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 34b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-32B has 21.