# Codellama 34b Instruct vs Qwen1.5-110B

> Qwen1.5-110B is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.2 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/codellama-34b-instruct-vs-qwen1-5-110b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 34b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen1.5-110B in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen1.5-110B leads 38.0 to 28.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Complete: 37.1% for Codellama 34b Instruct and 44.4% for Qwen1.5-110B.

## Snapshot

| | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 30.8 | 34.2 |
| Rank | 287 | 234 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.5 (#314)
- Qwen1.5-110B: 33.0 (#264)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 29% | 35% |
| LMArena Coding | 1046 | 1184 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 37.1% | 44.4% |
| HumanEval+ | 43.9% | — |
| MBPP+ | 56.3% | — |

## Reasoning

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 19.6 (#255)
- Qwen1.5-110B: 22.7 (#189)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1032 | 1168 |
| ForecastBench | — | 57.7 |

## Math

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 31.0 (#230)
- Qwen1.5-110B: 33.7 (#201)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1056 | 1185 |

## Knowledge

- Codellama 34b Instruct: —
- Qwen1.5-110B: 31.2 (#219)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1144 |

## Multilingual

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 25.8 (#284)
- Qwen1.5-110B: 33.6 (#250)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1011 | 1142 |
| LMArena Chinese | 976 | 1206 |
| LMArena French | — | 1151 |
| LMArena German | — | 1123 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1074 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1044 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1118 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1142 |

## Instruction Following

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 52.2 (#291)
- Qwen1.5-110B: 60.3 (#252)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1028 | 1158 |

## Long Context

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 30.9 (#284)
- Qwen1.5-110B: 35.1 (#242)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1013 | 1157 |

## Writing & Preference

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.2 (#297)
- Qwen1.5-110B: 38.0 (#255)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1066 | 1175 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1032 | 1148 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1015 | 1160 |

## FAQ

### Is Codellama 34b Instruct better than Qwen1.5-110B?

Qwen1.5-110B is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.2 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Codellama 34b Instruct or Qwen1.5-110B better for coding?

Qwen1.5-110B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.0 versus 28.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Codellama 34b Instruct and Qwen1.5-110B share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 34b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-110B has 20.