# Codellama 34b Instruct vs Qwen Plus

> Qwen Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.1 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/codellama-34b-instruct-vs-qwen-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 34b Instruct scores higher in 1 category and Qwen Plus in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen Plus leads 52.2 to 28.2.
- Codellama 34b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 30.8 | 37.1 |
| Rank | 287 | 210 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.20 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.5 (#314)
- Qwen Plus: 38.9 (#167)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1046 | 1328 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 29% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 37.1% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 43.9% | — |
| MBPP+ | 56.3% | — |

## Reasoning

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 19.6 (#255)
- Qwen Plus: 28.4 (#107)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1032 | 1317 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 63.3% |
| DTBench | — | 81.1% |
| LMCA | — | 24% |

## Math

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 31.0 (#230)
- Qwen Plus: 23.3 (#271)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1056 | 1326 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 17.8% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 65.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1.7% |

## Knowledge

- Codellama 34b Instruct: —
- Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#251)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 48.1% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1328 |

## Multilingual

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 25.8 (#284)
- Qwen Plus: 45.1 (#175)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1011 | 1310 |
| LMArena Chinese | 976 | 1347 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1251 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1323 |

## Instruction Following

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 52.2 (#291)
- Qwen Plus: 68.8 (#181)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1028 | 1303 |

## Long Context

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 30.9 (#284)
- Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#158)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1013 | 1324 |

## Writing & Preference

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.2 (#297)
- Qwen Plus: 52.2 (#176)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1066 | 1326 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1032 | 1293 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1015 | 1336 |

## FAQ

### Is Codellama 34b Instruct better than Qwen Plus?

Qwen Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.1 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Codellama 34b Instruct or Qwen Plus better for coding?

Qwen Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.9 versus 28.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Codellama 34b Instruct and Qwen Plus share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 34b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Plus has 20.