# Codellama 34b Instruct vs Olmo 3.1 32b Think

> Olmo 3.1 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/codellama-34b-instruct-vs-olmo-3-1-32b-think
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 34b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Think in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads 46.2 to 28.2.

## Snapshot

| | Codellama 34b Instruct | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 30.8 | 37.9 |
| Rank | 287 | 191 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.5 (#314)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 37.7 (#189)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1046 | 1291 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 29% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 37.1% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 43.9% | — |
| MBPP+ | 56.3% | — |

## Reasoning

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 19.6 (#255)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 25.2 (#150)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1032 | 1272 |

## Math

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 31.0 (#230)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 36.3 (#168)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1056 | 1305 |

## Knowledge

- Codellama 34b Instruct: —
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 35.7 (#181)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1295 |

## Multilingual

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 25.8 (#284)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.1 (#231)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1011 | 1209 |
| LMArena Chinese | 976 | 1242 |
| LMArena French | — | 1260 |
| LMArena German | — | 1262 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1193 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1289 |

## Instruction Following

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 52.2 (#291)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 65.6 (#218)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1028 | 1247 |

## Long Context

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 30.9 (#284)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.6 (#195)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1013 | 1272 |

## Writing & Preference

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.2 (#297)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 46.2 (#220)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1066 | 1272 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1032 | 1226 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1015 | 1252 |

## FAQ

### Is Codellama 34b Instruct better than Olmo 3.1 32b Think?

Olmo 3.1 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Codellama 34b Instruct or Olmo 3.1 32b Think better for coding?

Olmo 3.1 32b Think scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.7 versus 28.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Codellama 34b Instruct and Olmo 3.1 32b Think share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 34b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Think has 15.