# Codellama 34b Instruct vs Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct

> Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/codellama-34b-instruct-vs-olmo-3-1-32b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 34b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads 50.2 to 28.2.

## Snapshot

| | Codellama 34b Instruct | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 30.8 | 39.4 |
| Rank | 287 | 168 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.5 (#314)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.5 (#157)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1046 | 1347 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 29% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 37.1% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 43.9% | — |
| MBPP+ | 56.3% | — |

## Reasoning

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 19.6 (#255)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 26.4 (#132)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1032 | 1322 |

## Math

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 31.0 (#230)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.3 (#167)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1056 | 1305 |

## Knowledge

- Codellama 34b Instruct: —
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.1 (#175)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1308 |

## Multilingual

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 25.8 (#284)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.6 (#191)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1011 | 1275 |
| LMArena Chinese | 976 | 1304 |
| LMArena French | — | 1328 |
| LMArena German | — | 1282 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1206 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1268 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1336 |

## Instruction Following

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 52.2 (#291)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.6 (#187)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1028 | 1299 |

## Long Context

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 30.9 (#284)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#166)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1013 | 1312 |

## Writing & Preference

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.2 (#297)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.2 (#185)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1066 | 1311 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1032 | 1264 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1015 | 1309 |

## FAQ

### Is Codellama 34b Instruct better than Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct?

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Codellama 34b Instruct or Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better for coding?

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.5 versus 28.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Codellama 34b Instruct and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 34b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16.