# Codellama 34b Instruct vs OLMo 2 Furious 13B

> Codellama 34b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.8 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/codellama-34b-instruct-vs-olmo-2-furious-13b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads 42.9 to 28.2.

## Snapshot

| | Codellama 34b Instruct | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 30.8 | 29.7 |
| Rank | 287 | 304 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.5 (#314)
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.6 (#313)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 29% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 10.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1046 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 37.1% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 43.9% | — |
| MBPP+ | 56.3% | — |

## Reasoning

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 19.6 (#255)
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 15.5 (#314)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 16.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1032 | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 20.6% |
| LiveBench | — | 22.1% |

## Math

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 31.0 (#230)
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 23.1 (#273)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | — | 15.6% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 13.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1056 | — |

## Knowledge

- Codellama 34b Instruct: —
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.3 (#283)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | — | 31% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 31.6% |

## Multilingual

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 25.8 (#284)
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1011 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 976 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 52.2 (#291)
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 60.9 (#248)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 60.6% |
| IFEval | — | 73% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1028 | — |

## Long Context

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 30.9 (#284)
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1013 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.2 (#297)
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 42.9 (#230)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1066 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1032 | — |
| WildBench | — | 68.9% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1015 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 11.2% |

## FAQ

### Is Codellama 34b Instruct better than OLMo 2 Furious 13B?

Codellama 34b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.8 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Codellama 34b Instruct or OLMo 2 Furious 13B better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (28.5 vs 28.6); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### How many benchmarks do Codellama 34b Instruct and OLMo 2 Furious 13B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 34b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12.