# Codellama 34b Instruct vs Muse Spark 1.2

> Muse Spark 1.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/codellama-34b-instruct-vs-muse-spark-1-2
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 34b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Spark 1.2 in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Muse Spark 1.2 leads 72.3 to 28.2.
- Codellama 34b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Codellama 34b Instruct | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 30.8 | 50.3 |
| Rank | 287 | 48 |
| Context | — | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | — | $1.25 |
| Output $/M | — | $4.25 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.5 (#314)
- Muse Spark 1.2: 49.2 (#51)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1046 | 1495 |
| DeepSWE | — | 54.9% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1533 |
| FrontierSWE | — | 12% |
| SciCode | — | 56.4% |
| WeirdML | — | 60.3% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 29% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 37.1% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 43.9% | — |
| MBPP+ | 56.3% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Codellama 34b Instruct: —
- Muse Spark 1.2: 29.4 (#87)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 36.4% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 16% |

## Reasoning

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 19.6 (#255)
- Muse Spark 1.2: 51.3 (#34)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1032 | 1486 |
| SimpleBench | — | 74.5% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 79.2% |
| CritPt | — | 17.7% |
| DTBench | — | 94.7% |
| LMCA | — | 48.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 154.87 |

## Math

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 31.0 (#230)
- Muse Spark 1.2: 46.4 (#70)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1056 | 1471 |
| ProofBench | — | 43% |

## Knowledge

- Codellama 34b Instruct: —
- Muse Spark 1.2: 54.1 (#53)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 60.3% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1480 |

## Multimodal

- Codellama 34b Instruct: —
- Muse Spark 1.2: 43.4 (#25)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1305 |

## Multilingual

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 25.8 (#284)
- Muse Spark 1.2: 57.1 (#11)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1011 | 1478 |
| LMArena Chinese | 976 | 1511 |
| LMArena French | — | 1513 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1487 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1498 |

## Instruction Following

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 52.2 (#291)
- Muse Spark 1.2: 76.7 (#36)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1028 | 1461 |

## Long Context

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 30.9 (#284)
- Muse Spark 1.2: 45.2 (#48)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1013 | 1475 |

## Writing & Preference

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.2 (#297)
- Muse Spark 1.2: 72.3 (#14)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1066 | 1482 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1032 | 1449 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1015 | 1494 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1840 |

## FAQ

### Is Codellama 34b Instruct better than Muse Spark 1.2?

Muse Spark 1.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Codellama 34b Instruct or Muse Spark 1.2 better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.2 versus 28.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Codellama 34b Instruct and Muse Spark 1.2 share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 34b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark 1.2 has 31.