# Codellama 34b Instruct vs MiniMax-M2.7

> MiniMax-M2.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/codellama-34b-instruct-vs-minimax-m2-7
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 34b Instruct scores higher in 1 category and MiniMax-M2.7 in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiniMax-M2.7 leads 58.9 to 28.2.

## Snapshot

| | Codellama 34b Instruct | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | MiniMax |
| Noometry Index | 30.8 | 37.7 |
| Rank | 287 | 196 |
| Context | — | 205K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.30 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.20 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.5 (#314)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 41.8 (#120)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1046 | 1454 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1398 |
| SciCode | — | 47% |
| WeirdML | — | 37% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 29% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 37.1% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 599.25 |
| HumanEval+ | 43.9% | — |
| MBPP+ | 56.3% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Codellama 34b Instruct: —
- MiniMax-M2.7: 25.1 (#111)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 45.1% |
| ExploitBench | — | 13.3% |
| GBAEval | — | 0% |

## Reasoning

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 19.6 (#255)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 19.7 (#253)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1032 | 1422 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 24.7% |
| CritPt | — | 0.6% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 39.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 145.85 |

## Math

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 31.0 (#230)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 25.9 (#263)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1056 | 1420 |
| ProofBench | — | 3% |

## Knowledge

- Codellama 34b Instruct: —
- MiniMax-M2.7: 37.7 (#152)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 12.9% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1444 |

## Multilingual

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 25.8 (#284)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 50.3 (#123)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1011 | 1382 |
| LMArena Chinese | 976 | 1441 |
| LMArena French | — | 1421 |
| LMArena German | — | 1398 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1262 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1313 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1383 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1403 |

## Instruction Following

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 52.2 (#291)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 74.1 (#103)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1028 | 1405 |

## Long Context

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 30.9 (#284)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 43.3 (#99)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1013 | 1419 |

## Writing & Preference

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.2 (#297)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 58.9 (#112)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1066 | 1405 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1032 | 1354 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1015 | 1412 |

## FAQ

### Is Codellama 34b Instruct better than MiniMax-M2.7?

MiniMax-M2.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Codellama 34b Instruct or MiniMax-M2.7 better for coding?

MiniMax-M2.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 28.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Codellama 34b Instruct and MiniMax-M2.7 share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 34b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2.7 has 30.