# Codellama 34b Instruct vs MiMo-V2-Pro

> MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.4 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/codellama-34b-instruct-vs-mimo-v2-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 34b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2-Pro in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Pro leads 62.9 to 28.4.
- Codellama 34b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Codellama 34b Instruct | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 30.2 | 42.4 |
| Rank | 285 | 102 |
| Context | — | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.43 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.87 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.0 (#310)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 43.4 (#76)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1046 | 1476 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1433 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 29% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 37.1% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 785.17 |
| HumanEval+ | 43.9% | — |
| MBPP+ | 56.3% | — |

## Reasoning

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 18.8 (#250)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 21.3 (#200)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1032 | 1457 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 25.8% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 45.9% |

## Math

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.5 (#227)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 36.7 (#104)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1056 | 1447 |

## Knowledge

- Codellama 34b Instruct: —
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 40.8 (#106)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1479 |

## Multilingual

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 25.9 (#279)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 52.9 (#77)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1011 | 1416 |
| LMArena Chinese | 976 | 1455 |
| LMArena French | — | 1470 |
| LMArena German | — | 1417 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1366 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1401 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1427 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1458 |

## Instruction Following

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 52.4 (#286)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 76.2 (#46)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1028 | 1444 |

## Long Context

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 30.8 (#279)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.5 (#133)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1014 | 1455 |
| CL-bench | — | 15.7% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 6.9% |

## Writing & Preference

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.4 (#292)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 62.9 (#67)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1066 | 1436 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1032 | 1415 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1015 | 1456 |

## FAQ

### Is Codellama 34b Instruct better than MiMo-V2-Pro?

MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.4 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Codellama 34b Instruct or MiMo-V2-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.4 versus 28.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Codellama 34b Instruct and MiMo-V2-Pro share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 34b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Pro has 23.