# Codellama 34b Instruct vs MiMo-V2-Flash

> MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/codellama-34b-instruct-vs-mimo-v2-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 34b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2-Flash in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Flash leads 59.7 to 28.2.

## Snapshot

| | Codellama 34b Instruct | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 30.8 | 41.3 |
| Rank | 287 | 138 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.14 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.28 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.5 (#314)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1046 | 1443 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1330 |
| SciCode | — | 25.9% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 29% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 37.1% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 737.95 |
| HumanEval+ | 43.9% | — |
| MBPP+ | 56.3% | — |

## Reasoning

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 19.6 (#255)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1032 | 1420 |
| CritPt | — | 0% |

## Math

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 31.0 (#230)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1056 | 1396 |

## Knowledge

- Codellama 34b Instruct: —
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1425 |

## Multilingual

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 25.8 (#284)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1011 | 1392 |
| LMArena Chinese | 976 | 1462 |
| LMArena French | — | 1429 |
| LMArena German | — | 1395 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1325 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1358 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1387 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1420 |

## Instruction Following

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 52.2 (#291)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1028 | 1392 |

## Long Context

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 30.9 (#284)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1013 | 1409 |

## Writing & Preference

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.2 (#297)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1066 | 1411 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1032 | 1375 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1015 | 1404 |

## FAQ

### Is Codellama 34b Instruct better than MiMo-V2-Flash?

MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Codellama 34b Instruct or MiMo-V2-Flash better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.1 versus 28.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Codellama 34b Instruct and MiMo-V2-Flash share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 34b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Flash has 21.