# Codellama 34b Instruct vs Llama 3.2 1B

> Codellama 34b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.2 to 19.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/codellama-34b-instruct-vs-llama-3-2-1b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 34b Instruct scores higher in 5 categories and Llama 3.2 1B in 2 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Codellama 34b Instruct leads 28.5 to 9.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Complete: 37.1% for Codellama 34b Instruct and 11.3% for Llama 3.2 1B.

## Snapshot

| | Codellama 34b Instruct | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 30.2 | 19.9 |
| Rank | 285 | 349 |
| Context | — | 60K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.027 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.20 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.0 (#310)
- Llama 3.2 1B: 20.6 (#333)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 29% | 8.2% |
| LMArena Coding | 1046 | 1071 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 37.1% | 11.3% |
| HumanEval+ | 43.9% | — |
| MBPP+ | 56.3% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Codellama 34b Instruct: —
- Llama 3.2 1B: 14.5 (#142)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 10.8% |
| BALROG | — | 6.6% |

## Reasoning

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 18.8 (#250)
- Llama 3.2 1B: 15.6 (#304)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1032 | 1044 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 101.95 |

## Math

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.5 (#227)
- Llama 3.2 1B: 9.7 (#308)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1056 | 1086 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 0.6% |

## Knowledge

- Codellama 34b Instruct: —
- Llama 3.2 1B: 7.2 (#307)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 23.9% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1007 |

## Multilingual

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 25.9 (#279)
- Llama 3.2 1B: 23.9 (#287)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1011 | 973 |
| LMArena Chinese | 976 | 958 |
| LMArena German | — | 1014 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 941 |

## Instruction Following

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 52.4 (#286)
- Llama 3.2 1B: 52.6 (#285)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1028 | 1031 |

## Long Context

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 30.8 (#279)
- Llama 3.2 1B: 31.9 (#269)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1014 | 1050 |

## Writing & Preference

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.4 (#292)
- Llama 3.2 1B: 21.4 (#305)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1066 | 1055 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1032 | 1033 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1015 | 1030 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 200 |

## FAQ

### Is Codellama 34b Instruct better than Llama 3.2 1B?

Codellama 34b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.2 to 19.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Codellama 34b Instruct or Llama 3.2 1B better for coding?

Codellama 34b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 28.0 versus 20.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Codellama 34b Instruct and Llama 3.2 1B share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 34b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.2 1B has 22.