# Codellama 34b Instruct vs Granite 4.0 H Small

> Granite 4.0 H Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/codellama-34b-instruct-vs-ibm-granite-h-small
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 34b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Granite 4.0 H Small in 7 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in instruction following, where Granite 4.0 H Small leads 68.7 to 52.2.

## Snapshot

| | Codellama 34b Instruct | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | IBM |
| Noometry Index | 30.8 | 36.5 |
| Rank | 287 | 214 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.5 (#314)
- Granite 4.0 H Small: 36.4 (#209)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1046 | 1249 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 29% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 37.1% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 43.9% | — |
| MBPP+ | 56.3% | — |

## Reasoning

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 19.6 (#255)
- Granite 4.0 H Small: 24.4 (#163)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1032 | 1240 |

## Math

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 31.0 (#230)
- Granite 4.0 H Small: 31.4 (#223)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1056 | 1247 |
| Omni-MATH | — | 29.6% |

## Knowledge

- Codellama 34b Instruct: —
- Granite 4.0 H Small: 32.0 (#215)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | — | 56.9% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.2% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 38.3% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1251 |

## Multilingual

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 25.8 (#284)
- Granite 4.0 H Small: 38.6 (#228)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1011 | 1216 |
| LMArena Chinese | 976 | 1249 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1201 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1258 |

## Instruction Following

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 52.2 (#291)
- Granite 4.0 H Small: 68.7 (#183)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1028 | 1222 |
| IFEval | — | 89% |

## Long Context

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 30.9 (#284)
- Granite 4.0 H Small: 37.7 (#213)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1013 | 1242 |

## Writing & Preference

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.2 (#297)
- Granite 4.0 H Small: 43.8 (#227)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1066 | 1241 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1032 | 1211 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1015 | 1242 |
| WildBench | — | 73.9% |

## FAQ

### Is Codellama 34b Instruct better than Granite 4.0 H Small?

Granite 4.0 H Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Codellama 34b Instruct or Granite 4.0 H Small better for coding?

Granite 4.0 H Small scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.4 versus 28.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Codellama 34b Instruct and Granite 4.0 H Small share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 34b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.0 H Small has 19.