# Codellama 34b Instruct vs Granite 4.2 8B

> Granite 4.2 8B is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.5 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/codellama-34b-instruct-vs-granite-4-2-8b
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 9

## Summary

- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 34b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Granite 4.2 8B in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Granite 4.2 8B leads 49.6 to 28.2.

## Snapshot

| | Codellama 34b Instruct | Granite 4.2 8B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | IBM |
| Noometry Index | 30.8 | 40.5 |
| Rank | 287 | 148 |
| Context | — | 131K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.06 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.25 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.5 (#314)
- Granite 4.2 8B: 40.5 (#137)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Granite 4.2 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1046 | 1380 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 29% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 37.1% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 43.9% | — |
| MBPP+ | 56.3% | — |

## Reasoning

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 19.6 (#255)
- Granite 4.2 8B: 26.6 (#131)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Granite 4.2 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1032 | 1329 |

## Math

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 31.0 (#230)
- Granite 4.2 8B: —

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Granite 4.2 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1056 | — |

## Knowledge

- Codellama 34b Instruct: —
- Granite 4.2 8B: 38.4 (#145)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Granite 4.2 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1384 |

## Multilingual

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 25.8 (#284)
- Granite 4.2 8B: 44.5 (#178)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Granite 4.2 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1011 | 1302 |
| LMArena Chinese | 976 | 1366 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1285 |

## Instruction Following

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 52.2 (#291)
- Granite 4.2 8B: 68.7 (#184)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Granite 4.2 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1028 | 1301 |

## Long Context

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 30.9 (#284)
- Granite 4.2 8B: 40.3 (#159)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Granite 4.2 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1013 | 1324 |

## Writing & Preference

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.2 (#297)
- Granite 4.2 8B: 49.6 (#189)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Granite 4.2 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1066 | 1320 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1032 | 1236 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1015 | 1301 |

## FAQ

### Is Codellama 34b Instruct better than Granite 4.2 8B?

Granite 4.2 8B is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.5 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Codellama 34b Instruct or Granite 4.2 8B better for coding?

Granite 4.2 8B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.5 versus 28.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Codellama 34b Instruct and Granite 4.2 8B share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 34b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.2 8B has 11.