# Codellama 34b Instruct vs Granite 4.2 30b

> Granite 4.2 30b is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/codellama-34b-instruct-vs-granite-4-2-30b
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 9

## Summary

- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 34b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Granite 4.2 30b in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Granite 4.2 30b leads 53.8 to 28.2.

## Snapshot

| | Codellama 34b Instruct | Granite 4.2 30b |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | IBM |
| Noometry Index | 30.8 | 41.8 |
| Rank | 287 | 130 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.5 (#314)
- Granite 4.2 30b: 41.0 (#126)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Granite 4.2 30b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1046 | 1396 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 29% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 37.1% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 43.9% | — |
| MBPP+ | 56.3% | — |

## Reasoning

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 19.6 (#255)
- Granite 4.2 30b: 27.8 (#112)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Granite 4.2 30b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1032 | 1374 |

## Math

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 31.0 (#230)
- Granite 4.2 30b: —

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Granite 4.2 30b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1056 | — |

## Knowledge

- Codellama 34b Instruct: —
- Granite 4.2 30b: 39.1 (#138)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Granite 4.2 30b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1406 |

## Multilingual

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 25.8 (#284)
- Granite 4.2 30b: 47.3 (#151)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Granite 4.2 30b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1011 | 1340 |
| LMArena Chinese | 976 | 1414 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1343 |

## Instruction Following

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 52.2 (#291)
- Granite 4.2 30b: 71.2 (#155)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Granite 4.2 30b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1028 | 1347 |

## Long Context

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 30.9 (#284)
- Granite 4.2 30b: 41.4 (#140)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Granite 4.2 30b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1013 | 1359 |

## Writing & Preference

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.2 (#297)
- Granite 4.2 30b: 53.8 (#156)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Granite 4.2 30b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1066 | 1361 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1032 | 1288 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1015 | 1339 |

## FAQ

### Is Codellama 34b Instruct better than Granite 4.2 30b?

Granite 4.2 30b is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Codellama 34b Instruct or Granite 4.2 30b better for coding?

Granite 4.2 30b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.0 versus 28.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Codellama 34b Instruct and Granite 4.2 30b share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 34b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.2 30b has 11.