# Codellama 34b Instruct vs GLM-4.6V

> GLM-4.6V is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/codellama-34b-instruct-vs-glm-4-6v
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 9

## Summary

- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 34b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and GLM-4.6V in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-4.6V leads 56.6 to 28.2.

## Snapshot

| | Codellama 34b Instruct | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Z.ai (Zhipu) |
| Noometry Index | 30.8 | 41.3 |
| Rank | 287 | 137 |
| Context | — | 128K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.30 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.90 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.5 (#314)
- GLM-4.6V: 40.9 (#128)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1046 | 1390 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 29% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 37.1% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 43.9% | — |
| MBPP+ | 56.3% | — |

## Reasoning

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 19.6 (#255)
- GLM-4.6V: 27.6 (#115)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1032 | 1368 |

## Math

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 31.0 (#230)
- GLM-4.6V: —

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1056 | — |

## Knowledge

- Codellama 34b Instruct: —
- GLM-4.6V: 38.0 (#149)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1371 |

## Multimodal

- Codellama 34b Instruct: —
- GLM-4.6V: 34.8 (#90)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1164 |

## Multilingual

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 25.8 (#284)
- GLM-4.6V: 48.6 (#141)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1011 | 1359 |
| LMArena Chinese | 976 | 1425 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1340 |

## Instruction Following

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 52.2 (#291)
- GLM-4.6V: 71.4 (#151)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1028 | 1352 |

## Long Context

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 30.9 (#284)
- GLM-4.6V: 41.3 (#143)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1013 | 1358 |

## Writing & Preference

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.2 (#297)
- GLM-4.6V: 56.6 (#137)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1066 | 1377 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1032 | 1347 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1015 | 1360 |

## FAQ

### Is Codellama 34b Instruct better than GLM-4.6V?

GLM-4.6V is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Codellama 34b Instruct or GLM-4.6V better for coding?

GLM-4.6V scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.9 versus 28.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Codellama 34b Instruct and GLM-4.6V share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 34b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.6V has 12.