# Codellama 34b Instruct vs Gemini 3.5 Flash

> Gemini 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.2 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/codellama-34b-instruct-vs-gemini-3-5-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 34b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Gemini 3.5 Flash in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.5 Flash leads 62.8 to 19.6.
- Codellama 34b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Codellama 34b Instruct | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Google |
| Noometry Index | 30.8 | 54.2 |
| Rank | 287 | 32 |
| Context | — | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | — | $1.50 |
| Output $/M | — | $9 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.5 (#314)
- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 49.4 (#49)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1046 | 1492 |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 79.3% |
| DeepSWE | — | 37.4% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1499 |
| SciCode | — | 53.1% |
| WeirdML | — | 62.6% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 29% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 37.1% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 911.02 |
| HumanEval+ | 43.9% | — |
| MBPP+ | 56.3% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Codellama 34b Instruct: —
- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 24.7 (#114)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 27.5% |
| GBAEval | — | 6.7% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 14% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 5,396 |

## Reasoning

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 19.6 (#255)
- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 62.8 (#18)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1032 | 1488 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 72.1% |
| SimpleBench | — | 76.7% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 92.6% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 92.5% |
| CritPt | — | 13.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 50% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 25.4% |
| EBR-Bench | — | 4.8% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 32% |
| DTBench | — | 94.7% |
| LMCA | — | 47.1% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 58.1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 154.46 |
| ForecastBench | — | 59 |

## Math

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 31.0 (#230)
- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 60.7 (#36)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1056 | 1504 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 62.8% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 26.8% |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 76.3% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 95.6% |
| ProofBench | — | 31% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 39% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 14.6% |

## Knowledge

- Codellama 34b Instruct: —
- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 66.3 (#11)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 92.8% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 66.2% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1495 |

## Multimodal

- Codellama 34b Instruct: —
- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 45.7 (#15)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1310 |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | — | 33.6% |
| LMArena Document | — | 1463 |

## Multilingual

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 25.8 (#284)
- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 57.0 (#13)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1011 | 1476 |
| LMArena Chinese | 976 | 1526 |
| LMArena French | — | 1490 |
| LMArena German | — | 1492 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1486 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1451 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1493 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1480 |

## Instruction Following

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 52.2 (#291)
- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 77.0 (#30)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1028 | 1467 |

## Long Context

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 30.9 (#284)
- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 45.4 (#38)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1013 | 1482 |

## Writing & Preference

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.2 (#297)
- Gemini 3.5 Flash: 65.5 (#47)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1066 | 1482 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1032 | 1470 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1015 | 1481 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1087 |

## FAQ

### Is Codellama 34b Instruct better than Gemini 3.5 Flash?

Gemini 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.2 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Codellama 34b Instruct or Gemini 3.5 Flash better for coding?

Gemini 3.5 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.4 versus 28.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Codellama 34b Instruct and Gemini 3.5 Flash share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 34b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 3.5 Flash has 54.