# Codellama 34b Instruct vs Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

> Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.4 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/codellama-34b-instruct-vs-gemini-2-5-flash-lite
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 34b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads 57.0 to 28.4.
- Codellama 34b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Codellama 34b Instruct | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Google |
| Noometry Index | 30.2 | 36.4 |
| Rank | 285 | 208 |
| Context | — | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.10 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.40 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.0 (#310)
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 38.0 (#167)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1046 | 1373 |
| WeirdML | — | 35.2% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 29% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 37.1% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 325.9 |
| HumanEval+ | 43.9% | — |
| MBPP+ | 56.3% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Codellama 34b Instruct: —
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 27.8 (#89)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 36.9% |

## Reasoning

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 18.8 (#250)
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 21.5 (#196)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1032 | 1377 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 40.5% |
| DTBench | — | 62.8% |
| LMCA | — | 18.1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 133.93 |

## Math

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.5 (#227)
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 35.5 (#144)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1056 | 1373 |
| Omni-MATH | — | 48% |

## Knowledge

- Codellama 34b Instruct: —
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 32.1 (#206)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | — | 53.7% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 3.3% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 30.9% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1373 |

## Multimodal

- Codellama 34b Instruct: —
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 28.6 (#109)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1198 |
| VPCT | — | 30% |

## Multilingual

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 25.9 (#279)
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 49.5 (#129)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1011 | 1369 |
| LMArena Chinese | 976 | 1404 |
| LMArena French | — | 1388 |
| LMArena German | — | 1390 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1359 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1358 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1373 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1396 |

## Instruction Following

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 52.4 (#286)
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 70.2 (#163)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1028 | 1366 |
| IFEval | — | 81% |

## Long Context

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 30.8 (#279)
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 33.3 (#257)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1014 | 1373 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 47.2% |

## Writing & Preference

- Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.4 (#292)
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 57.0 (#130)

| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1066 | 1379 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1032 | 1366 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1015 | 1367 |
| WildBench | — | 81.8% |

## FAQ

### Is Codellama 34b Instruct better than Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite?

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.4 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Codellama 34b Instruct or Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite better for coding?

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.0 versus 28.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Codellama 34b Instruct and Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 34b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite has 33.